GST is the most ambitious and remarkable indirect tax reform in India’s post-Independence history. Its objective is to levy a single national uniform tax across India on all goods and services. GST has replaced a number of Central and State taxes, made India more of a national integrated market, and brought more producers into the tax net. By improving efficiency, it can add substantially to growth as well as government finances. Implementing a new tax, encompassing both goods and services, by the Centre and the States in a large and complex federal system, is perhaps unprecedented in modern global tax history.
GST is a tax on goods and services with comprehensive and continuous chain of set-off benefits up to the retailer level. It is essentially a tax only on value addition at each stage, and a supplier at each stage is permitted to set-off, through a tax credit mechanism, the GST paid on the purchase of goods and services. Ultimately, the burden of GST is borne by the end-user (i.e. final consumer) of the commodity/service. With the introduction of GST, a continuous chain of set-off from the original producer’s point and service provider’s point up to the retailer’s level has been established, eliminating the burden of all cascading or pyramiding effects of an indirect tax system. This is the essence of GST. GST taxes only the final consumer. Hence the cascading of taxes (tax-on-tax) is avoided and production costs are cut down.
As already noted, prior to the introduction of GST, the indirect tax system of India suffered from various limitations. There was a burden of tax-on-tax in the pre-GST system of Central excise duty and the sales tax system of the States. GST has taken under its wings a profusion of indirect taxes of the Centre and the States. It has integrated taxes on goods and services for set-off relief. Further, it has also captured certain value additions in the distributive trade. There is now a continuous chain of set-offs which would eliminate the burden of all cascading effects. Presently, services sector in India constitutes a tax base with vast potential which has not been exploited as yet. It is in this context that GST is justified as it has subsumed under it almost all the services for the purpose of taxation. Since major Central and State indirect taxes have got subsumed under GST, the multiplicity of taxes has been substantially reduced which, in turn, would decrease the operating costs of the country’s tax system. The uniformity in tax rates and procedures across the country will go a long way in reducing compliance costs.
In a nutshell, GST is a comprehensive indirect tax levy on manufacture, sale and consumption of goods as well as services at the national level. GST is an indirect tax for the whole of India to make it one unified common market. GST is designed to give India a world class tax system and improve tax collections. It would end the long-standing distortions of differential treatment of manufacturing sector and services sector. GST will facilitate seamless credit across the entire supply chain and across all States under a common tax base.
After receiving comments on the report from Government of India and concerned officials of the State Governments and taking into account their recommendations, the EC released the First Discussion paper on Goods and Services Tax in India on November 10, 2009 to obtain the inputs of industry, trade bodies, and people at large. On 22nd March 2011, the Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha to operationalize the GST and enable Centre and States to make laws for levying of GST. However, the Bill lapsed with the dissolution of the 15th Lok Sabha. Thereafter, on 19th December, 2014 the Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the Lok Sabha to address various issues related to GST. It is noteworthy that the introduction of GST required a Constitutional amendment as the Constitution did not vest express power either in the Central Government or State Government to levy tax on the ‘supply of goods and services’. While the Centre was empowered to tax services and goods up to the production stage, the States had the power to tax sale of goods. Since the GST regime requires goods and services to be simultaneously taxed by both the Central and State Governments, a Constitutional amendment was needed. The Constitution (122nd Amendment) Bill, 2014 was passed by the Lok Sabha on 6th May, 2015 after which the Rajya Sabha passed the Bill with 9 amendments on 3rd August, 2016. The Lok Sabha then passed the modified Bill on 8th August, 2016. After getting approval of half of the States, it was sent to the President for his assent which was given on 8th September, 2016. Thus the road to GST rollout was cleared and the process of enactment was completed.
GST would be applicable on “supply” of goods or services as against the erstwhile concept of tax on the manufacture of goods or on sale of goods or on provision of services.
As opposed to the previous principle of origin-based taxation, GST would be based on the principle of destination-based consumption taxation.
The Centre and the States would simultaneously levy tax on a common base. The GST to be levied by the Centre would be called Central GST (CGST) and the GST to be levied by the States (including Union territories with legislature) would be called State GST (SGST). Union territories without legislature would levy Union territory GST (UTGST).
An integrated GST (IGST) would be levied on inter-State supply of goods or services. This would be collected by the Centre so that the credit chain is not disrupted. Imports of goods and services would be treated as inter-State supplies and would be subject to IGST. (This would be in addition to applicable customs duties).
GST would make India a dynamic common market and result in generation of positive externalities. By ensuring uniformity of indirect tax rates across the country, it will substantially improve the ease of doing business.
Under GST, provision of seamless input tax credit across transactions will avoid tax cascading, eliminate double taxation and improve resource allocation.
Subsuming of all major indirect taxes will result in the removal of inefficient taxes. With as single tax to be paid, manufacturers will become more competitive and this could lead to growth in exports.
Harmonisation of tax rates and laws along with seamless input tax credits and a sound IT infrastructure is expected to lead to reduced compliance costs. As all the taxpayer services like registrations, payments, returns etc. will be available online, the compliance process would become simpler.
The understanding of the provisions of GST is still at a nascent stage for many people engaged in business. They are still trying to assess the mandated GST compliance provisions that their relevant functional departments (such as IT Department, Legal department) need to adhere to.
Businesses need to file multiple returns which may increase manifold in accordance with business models. Clients will need to ensure timely compliance by registered suppliers to ensure there is no loss of input credit. This will necessitate correct data and reports to fill accurate GST returns.
Businesses have to either update their existing accounting or ERP software to a GST-compliant software or buy a GST software so that they can keep their business going. Both the options lead to increased cost of software purchase and training of employees for an efficient utilization of the new billing software.
GST levied by the Centre on intra-State supply of goods or services or both is called CGST. It is levied under Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017 which makes provisions for the levy and collection of tax on intra-State supply of goods or services or both by the Central Government. The Act is divided into 21 chapters which deal with matters connected with the levy, collection and administration of GST.
GST levied by the States on intra-State supply of goods or services or both under their respective SGST Acts is called SGST.